Social Icons

Facebook Twitter More...

Pages

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Did we really land on the moon . Here Are ome explantion to why nasa csnt prove the landed on the moon.

Did We Really Land on the Moon?

Jerry Bennett

Beattie/Rowe

February 20,2003

Bennett 4

Works Cited

Apollo 11. Grolier synergetic Encyclopedia 2001. February 12,2003

Apollo Program. Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia 2001 February 12,2003

Moon Hoax. MSN 2-12-03

Yen, Bill. The Astronauts. vernal York:Exter Books. 1987. 52-68

Beattie 5th hr. Bennett 1

Did We Really Land On The Moon?

Do you trust we landed on the moonlight in 1969? NASA launched the Apollo 11 on a c atomic number 18 to land on the moon. We do a moon military commission in order to beat Russia to the moon. They went to the moon and hoard uped rock samples and brought them back to earth. So NASA thought the mission was a complete success. precisely, there are m each speculations about(predicate) the moon get. There are many ways to contradict NASA but very few to install them. The moon landing place was a hoax and here are many reasons to prove it.

We supposedly landed on the moon on July 20, 1969 at 10:56pm eastern daylight time. Neil Armstrong said his famous words, Thats unmatched small step for man and one giant give for mankind (Apollo 11). The landing sight was named tranquility. They landed on a relatively flat turn up. Once they landed on the surface they were to build a small science lab to collect data from the noon surface. NASA launched the mission to beat the Russian to the moon. The mission took eight days to complete. After they landed As a precautionary measure, the astronauts were quarantined for 14 days(Microsoft Encarta 2001). They landed safely in the Pacific Ocean. The launch was the most dateed launch in the world. There were journalist from 56 countries right there to watch the launch(Yenne 54). The Crew was Neil Armstrong, Edwin Aldrin Jr., and Michael Collins flew the Columbia...

I give to agree with iruser and serpentina, the seed has definately been able to show his strong feelings about the matter. Regardless of the silly grammer, I think this however makes for a good essay.


The facts that the write has put forward is very interesting. Like with many some another(prenominal) things (ie. World Trade Center/ 9.11) I think this is other little ameri locoweed conspiracy. As you fundament see, there are many things that just dont add up - and NASA cannot answer real questions to prove their side of things!


There are similarities with the 9/11 situation. There are soo many questions that have been avoided and no explination condition as to why there werent any jewish plenty in the building on 9/11 (even though about 40% or something of the work force in the WTC were jews).

I rated this essay good.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.

I could tell that the antecedent is genuinely convinced that no one actually landed on the moon and he did a good job of classification of convincing me that no one landed on the moon. But he is in the tenth grade and I can point out about 5- 10 grammer mistakes that he made and he needs to get his math right to. If the wench weighed 35,000 pounds on earth and the moon is 1/6 th of the earths weight then it would weigh 5,000 pounds not 6,000

The author was unimpeachably passionate about the subject, but his choice of presenting the arguments, as healthful as the references cited, were far from convincing.

As for finding facts to support the non-moon landing theory, the Israeli connection to 9/11 or any other outrageous conspiracy theory, one would only have to browse the internet and find facts to support their arguments. In cardinal minutes, I found pages that presented the following: Elvis and Jim Morrison are still alive under government protection, the holocaust never happened, and other theories.

Be careful when choosing references to ensure that the material is relevent, unbiased and accurate.

I giving you a good for the effort that you put into this authorship.

The author seems passionate about the subject, and that shows in this essay. However, the organization is choppy if non-existant, and can be a bit confusing at clock as to why he is telling us something. The paper serves as an excellent start, and could easily be re-worked into an excellent essay.

If you require to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.