Who makes meaning in a film - the director or the audience?

It is my opinion that a director makes meaning in a film, although the auditory modality will apply their own pictureing of it. charter has its own language and there are a wide-cut range of techniques a director can use to alter the audience to understand his meaning. The director uses mise-en-scène to contribute hugely to how meaning is made in a film - a large snap off of how the story is told comes from visual content. The elements coered by mise-en-scène are setting, hold up, costume, execution of instrument, lighting and colour. However, the director can be limited by genre conventions established over time, i.e. Westerns or sci-fi.

The setting of a film will immediately break-dance the audience meaning and expectations for the film. For instance, the opening sequence of Thelma and Louise (1992) lets the audience spang this film takes place in dry, barren wasteland of America. hold are inanimate objects used to enhance the audiences belief in the setting. Sometimes props can overlap into becoming part of a costume, for instance a cowboys gun. Costumes immediately tell the audience about the character - period, social class, lifestyle etc. Costumes and props can both help to define a films genre. An actors performance in a film is greatly aided by costumes and props, but the audience generally has differing opinions about characters. Using Thelma and Louise as a reference point again, although some people whitethorn think the two lead characters are heroines, others may disagree and think that they should have been caught and punished for their crimes. Another thing a director can have no control over is the audiences perception of an actor that comes from outside the film.



Tom Hanks, Jim Carrey and Steve Martin are triplet examples of actors which the audience will have very definite opinions of before...

this demonstrate has some good points, nut you dont point out the just about obvious example of the audience creating meaning- in citizen kane, the director hints at a few possibilitys, but ultimatly it is left to the viewer to resolve on who or what rosebud is.

I found this essay very informatory and that it explains itself effectively. This subject links towards the ideas of auteurism and is very enlightening. A must read for anyone studying anything film related, especially television production

If you want to target a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.